Anarchism: Cooperation, Decentralization, Social Cohesion

David Morris writes in On the Commons, regarding the anniversary of the of the Russian Peter  Kropotkin, an article: Is Not What You Think It Is — And There’s a Whole Lot We Can Learn from It:  The word has been so stripped of substance that it has come to be equated with chaos and nihilism. That’s not what it means:

I am astonished Hollywood has yet to discover Kropotkin. For his is the stuff of great movies.  Born to he spent his fighting and injustice.  A lifelong revolutionary, he was also a world-renowned geographer and zoologist.  Indeed, the intersection of and characterized much of his life.

His struggles against tyranny resulted in years in Russian and French jails.  The first time he was imprisoned in an outcry by many of the world’s best-known scholars led to his release.  The second time he engineered a spectacular escape and fled the country.  At the end of his life, back in his native Russia, he enthusiastically supported the overthrow of the Tsar but equally strongly condemned ’s increasingly and violent methods.      

In the 1920s Roger N. Baldwin summed up this way.

is referred to by scores of people who knew him in all walks of as “the noblest man” they ever knew. Oscar Wilde called him one of the two really happy men he had ever met…In the anarchist movement he was held in the deepest affection by thousands–“notre Pierre” the French workers called him. Never assuming position of leadership, he nevertheless led by the force of his personality and the breadth of his intellect. He combined in extraordinary measure high qualities of with a fine and passionate social feeling. His made a deep impression on a great range of classes–the whole scientific world, the Russian movement, the movements of all schools, and in the literary world which cared little or nothing for or revolution.” 

took on the social Darwinists of the day.  As a leading scientist, he countered the often accepted notion that is the primary driving force in and natural selection.  We need spokesmen like this today as the social Darwinists of our day tear at the fabric of with the destructive notions that and concentrations of are somehow ordained or inevitable.  enlightened those of his day on the advantages of cooperation, decentralization, and social cohesion.  The evidence from his scientific study showed that these factors drove natural selection.  Furthermore, these factors actually enhance not degrade what most people would accept as behaving humanely.  Darwinism is one of the nominally understood religions of our day.  Unfortunately, Darwin’s groundbreaking has been co-opted, ironically, by statist forces, who have little interest in the elevation or evolution of humanity.

David Morris’ article is a clarion call for all to learn more or revisit what means.  is not about chaos.  is about order, a humane order. was a leading advocate of how we must relate to one another in order to achieve a humane order.  I’ll give my proverbial vote to this leaderless leader!

Feel free to browse anarchist designs.

This entry was posted in News, Political and Philosophical Musings and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply